What we love and hate about Hoboken, New Jersey, that curious little city we live in.
Sunday, January 15, 2012
Hoboken St Patrick's Day Parade ≠ Trash Hoboken Day
On Friday, the Hoboken St. Patrick's Day Parade Committee released a letter canceling this year's parade. Nevertheless, at least one local bar and restaurant promoter is actively encouraging tens of thousands of non-residents to descend upon Hoboken for the traditional public urination and puke-fest known as Trash Hoboken Day.
Trash Hoboken Day has traditionally fallen on a weekend, the same day as Hoboken's St. Patrick's Day parade. But after last year's nationally publicized debacle, City Hall decided that the parade must be moved to a weekday. In their disingenuous letter to Hoboken residents, the Parade Committee made it clear that they would not consider holding the parade on any day other than Trash Hoboken Day. So they quit.
In the ensuing public debate on the city's various blogs, the main topic of discussion isn't about canceling the parade, but about canceling Trash Hoboken Day. But Trash Hoboken Day doesn't appear to have been canceled. Because people are actively promoting it, City Hall has no choice but to plan for the onslaught.
What about the parade? Why is the parade committee so insistent that the parade happen on Trash Hoboken Day? Many local residents don't even bother to attend the parade anymore because of the unruly drunks, and many of the unruly drunks don't even know there is a parade. That the parade committee genuinely considered holding the parade on a different day is not apparent in their letter. The only stated "reason" against holding the parade on a weekday is that it will be dark, which is false. For example, darkness falls in Hoboken between 7pm and 7:30pm on Wednesday March 14.
I know that not all Hoboken residents of Irish descent agree with the parade committee's decision. Not only that, there are plenty of Hoboken residents of non-Irish descent who enjoy "being Irish for a day," sharing in a celebration of Hoboken's rich Irish history.
Rather than attempting to compete with NYC's massive St. Patrick's Day parade, Hoboken's celebration could distinguish itself by having a more local focus. The parade could feature the High School marching band, local step dancers, prominent members of the Irish community, and the police and fire departments marching alongside. Afterwards we could all raise a few pints at the local pubs and restaurants, attend an Irish play at a local playhouse, attend a reading of Irish literature, or attend a lecture on Hoboken's Irish history. Yes, it's a marked contrast to Trash Hoboken Day, but that's the idea. Why can't we celebrate Hoboken's Irish heritage without inviting tens of thousands of outsiders to vomit and urinate on our streets, throw beer bottles at pedestrians from roof tops, and assault our police officers and fire fighters?
I encourage all prominent members of Hoboken's Irish community to consider forming a new parade committee. A committee that believes celebrating Irish heritage needn't be equated with trashing Hoboken. A committee who believes that Hoboken can celebrate its Irish heritage, regardless of the day of the week.
What happened to Beth Mason? When Hoboken's 2nd Ward Councilwoman Beth Mason began her political career in the early 2000s, she fought against corruption and fought for transparency. In 2003, she took the principled stand of resigning from the city's Planning Board, despite being Mayor Robert's designee for the position, because she disapproved of the direction Roberts was taking the city. She also co-founded Hoboken's People for Open Government (POG) which, in its early years, fought to release public records and fought to combat pay-to-play (contributing to a political campaign in exchange for future political favors). Finally, she decided to run for 2nd Ward Council, only to be defeated by a Robert's-backed incumbent. Mason persisted and, in 2007, she was elected as 2nd Ward Councilwoman. In a demonstration of her independence, she publicly announced she would forgo her Council salary and benefits.
Mason's Run for Mayor
Everything changed when Mason decided to run for Mayor in 2009. In the spring election, she lost by a significant margin to Peter Cammarano and Dawn Zimmer. Of course, Cammarano went on to beat Zimmer in a run-off election, but he was arrested only a month into his term for accepting bribes from an undercover FBI informant. That fall, a special election was held to fill the vacant Mayor's seat. Once again Mason ran against Zimmer and, once again, she lost by a significant margin. All told, Mason spent in excess of $1 million on campaign expenses; the majority of it her own money. Moreover, while her spending more than doubled Zimmer's, she received only a third of the votes that Zimmer did.
After losing the first Mayoral election, Mason, still holding her Council seat, reneged on her pledge to forgo her Council salary and benefits. Not only that, she demanded she receive "back pay" for the salary she had voluntarily forgone. Mason's public persona had changed and her supporters noticed it. Between the two Mayoral elections Mason lost many of her supporters, who defected to support Zimmer in the fall election.
The New Beth Mason
Since losing the mayoral elections in 2009, Mason has morphed beyond recognition. Just last year, she made large and ethically questionable campaign contributions to Tim Occhipinti's 4th Ward Council election campaign. Occhipinti was running as an opponent to a Zimmer-supported candidate. First, Mason and her husband each contributed the maximum individual amount of $2,600 to Occhipinti's campaign. Then, Mason's campaign committee, dormant since she ran for Mayor, contributed another $8K to his campaign. And finally, she contributed another $6K for "canvassing" expenses. By exploiting loopholes in campaign financing law, Mason's total contribution far exceeded the maximum legal individual contribution, making this a perfect example of the kind of campaign financing that Mason once fought so hard against.
Incredibly, Mason also contributed to Mike Russo's 3rd Ward Council election campaign this year. Mike Russo is a classic example of the kind of corrupt politician that Mason once fought against. In fact, in the months leading up to the election, FBI videos were released showing Russo accepting a bribe from the same undercover informant responsible for Cammarano's arrest!
Most recently, Mason's voting record indicates that the welfare of Hoboken is the last thing on her mind. The most deplorable example is Mason's attempt to kill the planned sale of Hoboken's only hospital. Much has been written about this elsewhere so it is sufficient to point out that killing the sale would have resulted in the loss of Hoboken's only hospital, layoffs of thousands of hospital employees, and a bill to the city that would have forced the city to declare bankruptcy. Mason has also voted against maintaining a budget reserve, and she's voted against routine budget line item transfers even after being warned in a letter from the State that voting this way violated a Councilperson's fiduciary responsibility. Mason's votes jeopardize the city's financial well-being, which would appear to be precisely the point. The reasoning is that if the city is financially damaged, then it will be viewed as Mayor Zimmer's fault, not Mason's, and then Mason will be in a position to finally be elected as Mayor.
Finally there are the questions that have arisen regarding Mason's uncanny premonition of an email scandal at City Hall before its investigation by the FBI was made public earlier this month. With one arrest already, and others expected, this is a story that is still being told.
What Happened?
Mason's ever-worsening behavior has not escaped the public's notice. There is even discussion of organizing a campaign to recall her from public office.
So what happened to Beth Mason? Her behavior is consistent with a thwarted quest for power, lashing out at the person who bested her: Mayor Zimmer. In this context it's reasonable to ask if she was ever interested in the betterment of Hoboken. Was her early behavior just part of a cynical strategy to attain power? Or did she sincerely care about Hoboken at one time, only to abandon her principles in order to get ever closer to power? In any event, there is plenty of evidence that, today, she doesn't adhere to any of the principles that reformers would recognize. And that would seem to be a suitable introduction for a lament.....
Hoboken City Council Vote to Finalize Hospital Sale
At a special City Council meeting on Sunday October 30, a vote was held to decide whether to accept the final terms of the agreement for the city to sell the Hoboken University Medical Center. Up until this point, the minority council members, Tim Occhipinti, Theresa Castellano, Michael Russo, and Beth Mason, had voted against the sale, jeopardizing the existence of the hospital and over 1,000 hospital jobs. Preventing the sale would also have put the city on the hook for over $50 million which would have resulted in massive layoffs of city employees and increased taxes. The community took notice and began to pressure the council minority to change their vote to support the hospital sale. At this meeting the council minority finally conceded, and voted in support of the sale.
The last couple of elections in this city have really got me
thinking. Taken at face value, none of it makes any sense.
Look Who Got Elected
For
starters, consider the City Council election last May. Incumbent Third Ward
Councilman Michael Russo was re-elected by a huge margin over his
opponent despite the fact that, just prior to the election, FBI tapes
were released showing him accepting a bribe from an informant –
this latest revelation being only the icing on his already large, well-documented, corruption cake. (See the 'Links' section at the bottom of this article for links to further reading on this and other items discussed in this article.)
Councilman Michael Russo
Councilwoman Theresa Castellano
Russo's cousin (once removed), incumbent First Ward Councilwoman
Theresa Castellano, also won by a comfortable margin. Castellano is the
longest serving council member (twenty years) and she too has been the
center of corrupt dealings in the past. One example: in 2000, she
single-handedly awarded a big fat raise to her cousin, then mayor,
and now convicted felon (and Michael Russo's father), Anthony
Russo. Fortunately, a lawsuit launched by a citizen resulted in the
raise being nixed.
Both Russo and Castellano handily defeated their opponents – reform-minded residents sick and tired of Hoboken's long history of corruption. Corruption won the day.
In last April's School Board elections the same thing happened. A
slate bankrolled by local real-estate developer Frank Raia swept the
elections. Receiving the highest number of votes was incumbent Carmelo
Garcia, a long time School Board member; his board position being one of three jobs he presently holds (two of them tax-payer funded). In 2006 Garcia was found guilty of violating the New Jersey School Ethics Act by voting to award a job to his brother, and another job to his boss at the time, former Hudson County Freeholder Maurice Fitzgibbons.
School Board Trustee Carmelo Garcia
School Board Trustee Frances Rhodes-Kearns
Frances Rhodes-Kearns was another member of Raia's slate. She also happens to be Maurice Fitzgibbons' cousin, and she was a member of convicted Mayor Peter Cammarano's election slate in 2009. In 2005, as School Board President,
Rhodes-Kearns voted to award a job-for-life, with notoriously lax
terms of employment, to fellow School Board member, David Anthony, who
already had a full-time job (another board member who voted in favor
was Frank Raia). Fortunately, Anthony chose to resign from this job after
a reform majority swept the School Board elections last year. This
year, however, was a different story: Rais's slate trounced the anti-corruption reform candidates.
All of these politicians have a well-known history of corruption and yet they
were elected by wide margins. What could possibly be going on? Who
could possibly be voting for these people? How could their
anti-corruption opponents lose so badly? At City Hall, when it became
clear that Raia's slate had swept the elections, Raia was
heard saying that the win confirmed that the people were sick and tired
of what's been going on and wanted a change. Huh? A change from reform to corruption? Who would want that?
While these questions are seemingly baffling, the answers become evident when we take a look back at Hoboken's history.
Feast Bombs
No one would dispute that Hoboken is no longer the city it used to be. Talk to anyone who's lived hear more than ten years and you'll hear them remark how much things have changed. Talk to someone who's lived here more than fifty years and you'll get an earful.
The changes started with the loss of the city's traditional employers: the factories, the ship yards, and all the services that supported them. By the early '70s they were almost all gone and Hoboken was destitute and crumbling. In 1970 the Urban League named Hoboken one of seven cities in the US that might well be past saving. And then came gentrification.
Holland America Piers at 5th St., Hoboken, 1948 (Hoboken Historical Museum Archives)
Kids in playground, Hoboken, 1976 (John Conn, from "From Another Time: Hoboken in the 1970s", Hoboken Historical Museum pub.)
It started slowly in the late '60s as artists started to move in and, by the mid-'80s, it became white hot as "newcomers," more commonly referred to by the derisive term "Yuppies," moved into shiny new developments in droves. What came next was inevitable given the hyper-development in a mile-square city: old butted up against new and, occasionally, sparks would fly. The issue that came to symbolize this clash of cultures was the "feast bombs."
Today, residents are undoubtedly familiar with the different religious
processions and feasts that take place during the summer months and
early fall. But one aspect of the feasts is a shadow of what it used
to be. Traditionally, the celebrations included lighting
fireworks in the streets – known as "feast bombs" – for
nights on end. To some newcomers, this was charming at first
but, after a night or two of lost sleep, the feast bombs became irritating.
Lighting fireworks in the street, Hoboken, 197? (Benedict Fernandez, from "From Another Time: Hoboken in the 1970s", Hoboken Historical Museum pub.)
A letter of complaint from a "Yuppie" to the Hoboken Reporter in 1986
became the first shot in what was to become a popular, long-running
war of words in the paper's letters section. As the argument was
framed at the time, the feast bomb issue
forced Hoboken residents to choose a side: "us" or "them." The old Hoboken BnRs ("born and raised") saw their old community disappearing and they blamed the Yuppies for it.
The Yuppie Myth
And here we are, a quarter century later, and I invite you to listen to a thirty second excerpt of a speech made only last year by First Ward Councilperson Theresa Castellano:
Listening to the rousing cheers Castellano receives, it's clear that
not much has changed since 1986. But how can that be? It's a stretch
to be calling people who moved to Hoboken twenty, thirty, or forty years ago "Yuppies." Many of these so-called Yuppies have established their own businesses in the city, they've raised families in the city, their kids go to school and play on teams with BnR kids. In fact, these Yuppie's kids are part of the next generation of BnRs! The whole idea of "Yuppie" is ridiculous today – it's a myth. Nevertheless, this Yuppie myth persists. Why? Well, the reason why brings us back to the where we started: corruption.
Keeping the Myth Alive
Castellano, Russo, Garcia and Rhodes-Kearns, and many others, have
a vested interest in keeping the Yuppie myth alive. It's in their best
interest to encourage their supporters to believe they are under siege
by Yuppies; that Yuppies are trying to destroy their community. This
is how they get the votes they desperately need. The fear and anger
they arouse blinds people to the damage they have done to the
city, and to the damage they have demonstrated a willingness to do if they regain power. Look no further than Russo and Castellano's recent concerted efforts to kill Hoboken's only hospital, layoff masses of city workers, and leave the Police Department in a state of disrepair.
Not every one of their supporters necessarily believes the Yuppie
myth. A small number stand to gain if the people they support gain
power, so it's as convenient for them to perpetuate the myth as it is
for the people they support. The City of Hoboken and the Hoboken
School Board have a long history of hiring unqualified friends and
relatives, awarding them with raises, no-bid contracts, jobs created
out of thin air, or cheap housing. Forensic audits requested by the current reform majorities on City Council and the School Board have uncovered numerous examples of this.
Obviously not every supporter can benefit so richly; the city and
School Board budgets can only be stretched so far – and they
most certainly have, most recently resulting in the near bankruptcy of
the city in 2008. Also, it mustn't be forgotten that these awards don't come for free. Those awarded are expected to give back. In the immortal words of Councilman Russo, captured on FBI tapes as he boasted about finding housing for someone in exchange for political favors: "I do for you, you do for me."
When an unqualified friend or relative is awarded, then those who legitimately qualify are passed over. For example, When someone is awarded housing, those already waiting for housing have to wait for a few more years. When someone is awarded with a job or a raise, then a more deserving qualified person is less likely to receive one. Basically, the majority of those who support corrupt politicians end up worse off than if they hadn't supported them. These supporters, the vast majority of them, while perhaps
holding out hope for a job or housing, will get nothing more than a
Christmas poinsettia, an Easter basket, $100 in the Bingo pot, or $40
"street money" for their vote on election day.
One of many poinsettias distributed to Third Ward constituents in 2010.
Is this the answer then? Is this why corrupt politicians continue to
be elected? Is is because of a fear and hatred of Yuppies, a few
bucks or a potted plant, and the hope of receiving a job or
cheap housing? As the voting record reveals, the
answer appears to be "yes."
Who Invited the Yuppies?
The ultimate irony is, of course, that the Yuppie invasion so many blame for their loss of community is a direct result of supporting corrupt politicians in the first place. Think of it this way: if too many relatives show up at your house for Thanksgiving dinner, do you blame the relatives? No. You blame your spouse for inviting them all.
So who invited the Yuppies to Hoboken? Every mayor but one in the
course of 36 years, from 1973 to 2009, has been pro hyper-development,
actively inviting Yuppies to move to Hoboken: Steven Cappiello,
Patrick Pasculli, Anthony Russo, David Roberts and, of course, most
recently Peter Cammarano. Yet every one of these mayors was embraced
as a savior from the Yuppie scourge despite their working tirelessly to develop every acre of the city, at the expense of parkland, infrastructure and services.
It should be remembered that the only reason Hoboken has its beautiful waterfront parks is because of fierce opposition and lawsuits from the community; people who recognized that over-development was destroying Hoboken's community. One has to question why these mayors, and their majority councils, encouraged development over so many years when they could plainly see the damage it was causing. For three of these mayors, Anthony Russo, David Roberts, and Peter Cammarano, the reason is clear. Russo's wife netted in excess of $1,000,000 in commissions from exclusive real-estate agent listings for new condo development projects that were approved while her husband was mayor. Roberts' received over $35,000 in direct campaign contributions, and tens of thousands more in indirect contributions via the Hudson County Democratic Organization and the Hoboken Democratic Party, all from the development company whose plans he supported. Cammarano was convicted for receiving kickbacks from an FBI informant posing as a real estate developer.
Hoboken's beautiful waterfront promenade, 2010.
And let's not forget the School Board. Many people don't realize how
important the School Board is for Hoboken, as is evident from the
paltry 9% of Hoboken's registered voters who bothered to cast votes in
the April School Board elections. Nevertheless, the School Board oversees a large budget, almost $60 million, of which $36 million factors into city taxes.
Control over such a large pot of money, combined with the relative ease of winning a School Board seat, is what makes the School Board such an attractive target for corrupt politicians. They pilfer the School Board the same way that a corrupt City Council and mayor pilfer the city: by awarding jobs and no-bid contracts to unqualified friends and relatives. Not only do Hoboken's taxpayers get stuck footing the bill, but Hoboken's kids suffer because the money in the budget is diverted to corrupt politicians and their friends, not to the schools.
Hoboken High School, 2009. (Nightscream, Wikipedia)
But there's something even more insidious at play when corruption
infiltrates the School Board – something that should give pause
to those who still believe the Yuppie myth: electing corrupt
politicians to the School Board serves to further deteriorate Hoboken's community. Poor schools make the city less attractive for families, but it's families that form the basis for any community.
Repairing Hoboken's Community
So the Yuppie myth is exactly that: a myth. It's not the Yuppies we should be scared of, it's the corrupt politicians. For decades they've done nothing but erode Hoboken's sense of community in order to live a life of comfort at the expense of Hoboken residents, old and new. "Yuppies" have been taking up residence and raising families in Hoboken for over forty years now; it goes without saying that they have as much a stake in building Hoboken's community as any other resident. In fact, many Yuppies have taken part in efforts to slow down development, create park space, and root out corruption.
Today, Hoboken is at a critical juncture. As evidenced by the past two
elections, the forces of corruption have joined together to
effectively erode the reform majorities on both the City Council and
the School Board. Anti-corruption reformers currently maintain only
the slimmest of majorities. Former political enemies like the Russo
family, Frank Raia, and Beth Mason first joined forces to support Tim
Occhipinti's successful bid for City Council in late 2010, and
repeated their success last May.
These same forces successfully got out the vote for Michael Russo,
Theresa Castellano, Beth Mason, Carmelo Garcia, Frances Rhodes-Kearns,
and Peter Biancamano. Occhipinti and Biancamano's campaign
teams, and their voting records since they were elected, reveal they
are nothing more than the new faces of the corrupt Old
Guard. Meanwhile, reform candidates fared poorly in the elections,
despite a concerted effort on their part to get out the vote. What happened? Do the majority of the Hoboken electorate actually believe the Yuppie myth?
No. The answer is simply that fewer people have been voting since reformers gained majority control only two years ago. The numbers say it all: only 3,400 of 36,000 (9%) of registered voters voted in the last School Board election, and only 7,900 (22%) voted in the last City Council election. Compare this to just two years earlier when 5,000 (14%) voted in the the 2010 School Board elections, and over 13,000 (36%) voted in the November 2009 mayoral election.
When fewer people vote, those who support the Yuppie myth have more
influence, and corrupt politicians are more likely to be elected. Given the tenuous position of reform majorities at present, it follows that if more people don't vote in upcoming elections, then
corruption will reign once more in Hoboken. Eligible voters take note: the next two elections are the Hudson County Freeholder election on November 8th, with reformer Kurt Gardiner opposing incumbent Anthony Romano, and the School Board election in April 2012, where reformers are likely to oppose a slate supported by Frank Raia, Beth Mason, and the Russo family.
I want to close with a story I heard recently about a Mom in a local park talking to two boys who were looking for kids to play ball with. The Mom suggested the kids go play with a couple of kids nearby, to which one replied "Nah. We don't want to play with them. They're Yuppies." This is a tragedy. A new generation is being brain-washed with the Yuppie myth, virtually guaranteeing that Hoboken will remain a dysfunctional community for decades to come. This has to stop, and the only way to stop it is to stop supporting the corruption that is causing it. The less influence a corrupt politician has, the more people will ignore them and, eventually, they will become inconsequential, and disappear, unable to poison the community any more.
Madison Park, Hoboken, 2009.
Links
RussoCorruption.com. A web site documenting Michael Russo's, and his family's, history of corrupt activities. Link
Hoboken Reporter article, August 19 2000, by David Danzig, describing Theresa Castellano's one-person vote to award a raise to her cousin, then Mayor Anthony Russo. Link
Hoboken Reporter article, March 14 2006, by Tom Jennemann, describing ethics charges against Carmelo Garcia. Link
nj.com article, April 4 2011, by Terrence McDonald, describing the three government jobs currently held by Carmelo Garcia. Link
Hoboken Journal article, June 30 2010, by Kurt Gardiner, describing Frances Rhodes-Kearns' vote to award David Anthony a job, and details regarding Anthony's contract. Link
nj.com article, March 3 2009, by Carly Baldwin, stating that convicted Mayor Peter Cammarano's slate included Frances Rhodes-Kearns and Angel Alicea. In addition to Cammarano's conviction in 2010, Alicea resigned as the city's Public Safety Directory in April 2011 when it was discovered that Alicea had not disclosed he had met with the same FBI informant that Michael Russo and Peter Cammarano had met with in 2009. Link
"From Another Time: Hoboken in the 1970s," edited by Robert Foster, designed by McKevin Shaughnessy, published by the Hoboken Historical Museum, 2007, ISBN 978-0-9768525-2-0 . This fantastic book includes engaging essays, by "BnR" Anthony DePalma and "Yuppie" Sada Fretz, describing life in Hoboken in the 1970s. It also includes more than 150 beautiful, large format, black and white photos of Hoboken from that time, taken by three talented photographers: Caroline Carlson, John Conn, and Benedict Fernandez. The book can be purchased from the Hoboken Historical Society. Link
The Hoboken Historical Museum online archives. This is a vast, searchable archive of photos, illustrations and documents in the museum's collection. It's very easy to get lost looking at photos of Hoboken, some of which date back to the beginning of the last century. Also you can find some of the photos from the aforementioned "From Another Time: Hoboken in the 1970s" book here. Link
Hoboken Historical Museum. If you aren't already a member of the Hoboken Historical Museum, you can join online. Link
New York Times article, March 6 1987, by By Michael Winerip, describing the war of "Feast Bomb" letters in the Hoboken Reporter. Link
Hoboken Reporter article, October 20 2011, describing how recent "No" votes from Michael Russo, Theresa Castellano, Beth Mason and Tim Occhipinti, have put many city workers in jeopardy of being laid off, and prevented the Police Department headquarters from undergoing much needed repairs. Link
Hoboken Patch article, September 22 2011, by Claire Moses, describing how the recent "No" votes from Michael Russo, Theresa Castellano, Beth Mason and Tim Occhipinti, jeopardized the existence of Hoboken's only hospital. Link
New York Times article, June 26 2008, by Peter Applebome, describing how Hoboken's budget grew from $52 million to over $100 million in only 7 years, resulting in the State of New Jersey appointing a fiscal monitor to take control of Hoboken's budget. Link
New York Times article, February 9 1986, by Anthony DePalma, describing how pro-development Mayor Steven Cappiello was ousted after 12 years in office by anti-development Mayor Thomas Vezzetti. Vezzetti died of a heart attack three years later. Link
New York Times article, May 5 1989, by Anthony DePalma, describing the pro-development stance of Mayor Patrick Pasculli. Link
RussoCorruption.com. This site provides links to documents showing that Mayor Anthony Russo's wife, Michele Russo, made in excess of $1 million in real estate transactions for condo development projects approved by City Hall while Anthony Russo was mayor. Link
New York Times article, March 20 2005, by Terry Golway, describing the community uproar over Mayor David Roberts endorsement of a massive redevelopment plan by developers who had contributed over $35,000 to his election campaigns. Link
New York Times article, April 20 2010, by Richard Pérez-Peña, describing Mayor Peter Cammarano's guilty plea to accepting campaign contributions in exchange for favoring development projects. Link
Delivered Vacant, 1992. A terrific documentary film by Nora Jacobson chronicling the tumultous history of Hoboken's development from 1984 to 1992. Available on loan from the Hoboken Historial Museum for museum members.Link
Fund for a Better Waterfront. A citizen-based organization that has, over the past two decades, worked to ensure that Hoboken's waterfront can be enjoyed by the community. Link
Hoboken Journal article, March 28 2011, by Kurt Gardiner, providing an overview of the recent School Board budget. Link
Hoboken Patch article, November 2 2010, by Claire Moses, describing Tim Occhipinti's election win, as he is surrounded by his supporters, Councilman Michael Russo, Councilwoman Theresa Castellano, and Councilwoman Beth Mason. Link
Hoboken Reporter article, December 19 2010, by Ray Smith, exploring the unusually high correlation between the Occhipinti campaign's paid workers and vote-by-mail submissions. Link
Hoboken Reporter article, June 5 2011, by Ray Smith, describing Frank Raia and Beth Mason's financing of the School Board election slate comprising Carmelo Garcia, Frances Rhodes-Kearns, and Peter Biancamano. It also describes the unusually strong correlation between the slate's paid campaign workers and vote-by-mail submissions. Link
Mile Square View article, November 4 2009, by Roman Brice, showing vote tallies for the most recent mayoral election, won by current Mayor Dawn Zimmer. Link
Hoboken Patch article, April 20 2010, by Claire Moses, showing vote tallies for the spring 2010 School Board election in which reformers swept all three seats. Link
Hoboken Reporter article, July 10 2011, by Ray Smith, describing low turnouts in the 2011 City Council and 2011 School Board elections. Link
Hoboken Reporter article, June 12 2011, by Ray Smith, investigating what motivated Third Ward residents to re-elect Michael Russo, in light of Russo's corrupt history. The responses he receives from Russo's supporters reveal they are blind to corruption and the damage he has inflicted on their city. Link